Initial Quality & Ethics Screening
All manuscripts undergo an initial editorial assessment to evaluate scope alignment, research quality, originality, and ethical compliance before proceeding to detailed review.
Expert Reviewer Assignment
Manuscripts are evaluated by qualified subject-matter experts with relevant academic and research experience to ensure informed and objective assessment.
Double-Blind Review Model
ASR follows a double-blind review approach, where the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential to minimize bias and ensure impartial evaluation.
Evaluation Criteria
Reviewers assess manuscripts based on:
Originality and novelty of research
Clarity, structure, and academic presentation
Methodological accuracy and data validity
Contribution to the relevant research field
Ethical compliance and proper citation practices
Revision & Improvement
Authors may be requested to revise their manuscripts based on reviewer feedback and editorial recommendations. Revisions are reviewed to ensure concerns are adequately addressed.
Editorial Decision Authority
ASR reserves the right to recommend rejection or withdrawal of support for manuscripts that fail to meet academic, ethical, or scientific standards, including cases of plagiarism or insufficient validity.
Confidentiality Assurance
All reviewer reports, comments, and editorial decisions are treated as strictly confidential and are not disclosed to third parties.
Final Decision
Final acceptance and submission recommendations are based on reviewer evaluations and the decision of the editorial team.
